Core answer: Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) = waist ÷ hip, both in cm. WHO risk thresholds: men ≥0.90 and women ≥0.85 indicate abdominal obesity and elevated cardiometabolic risk; ideal is men <0.90, women <0.80. WHR predicts heart disease and diabetes independently of BMI — a normal-BMI person with a high WHR ("skinny fat") carries real risk. Measure waist at the navel level (end of normal exhale), hips at the widest point.
The standards table
| Category | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| Low risk | <0.90 | <0.80 |
| Moderate risk | 0.90–0.99 | 0.80–0.84 |
| High risk | ≥1.00 | ≥0.85 |
China's guideline adds a waist-only rule: central obesity at waist ≥90 cm (men) / ≥85 cm (women) regardless of ratio.
How to measure (accuracy lives here)
- Waist: stand relaxed, exhale normally, tape horizontal at the midpoint between lowest rib and iliac crest (≈ navel level). Don't suck in, don't pull tight.
- Hip: widest point over the buttocks, feet together.
- Same tape, same time of day (morning best), skin or thin clothing. A 2 cm measurement error swings WHR by ~0.02–0.03.
Worked examples
Example 1 — Male, waist 88, hip 98. WHR = 0.898 — just under 0.90, low-risk band but one hotpot season from the line. Trend matters: remeasure monthly.
Example 2 — Female, waist 78, hip 92. WHR = 0.848 — moderate risk even if BMI is 22 (normal). This is the classic "normal weight, high visceral fat" profile; waist-focused training + diet beats scale-watching.
Example 3 — Why WHR beats BMI for shape. Two men, both BMI 27: A waist 85/hip 100 (WHR 0.85, muscular), B waist 102/hip 100 (WHR 1.02, abdominal fat). Same BMI, completely different risk. BMI can't see this; WHR can.
Example 4 — Visceral vs subcutaneous. A firm, protruding belly (can barely pinch) suggests visceral fat — metabolically dangerous; a soft, pinchable belly is subcutaneous — less risky. WHR catches both, but the "pinch test" adds context.
Common mistakes and myths
- Measuring at the belt line — trousers sit below the anatomical waist; the reading comes out flattering and wrong.
- Sucking in — 5 cm of theater ruins the number; normal exhale, relaxed abdomen.
- Spot-reduction belief — crunches don't burn belly fat (no exercise does); WHR improves through overall fat loss plus core training for posture.
- Ignoring the waist-only rule — in Asian populations, waist ≥90/85 cm flags risk even at WHR <0.90/0.85; use both numbers.
- Daily tracking — waist varies 1–3 cm through the day with meals and bloating; weekly morning measurements are the signal, everything else is noise.