Core answer: Comparing loans: convert EVERYTHING to APR (annual percentage rate on remaining balance), then compare total interest + fees at your EXPECTED holding period. A 3.6% mortgage-style rate beats a "2.8% fee-rate" product (real APR ≈ 5.2%) every time. Shorter terms cost less interest but higher monthly payments; the break-even on term length is whether you can invest the payment difference above the loan rate.

The comparison framework

  1. Normalize to APR — flat fee rates (费率) × ~1.85 ≈ APR; ask lenders for the APR directly (required disclosure in China since 2021).
  2. Total cost = interest + all fees (origination, insurance bundling, GPS, service).
  3. Match your horizon — comparing 3-yr vs 5-yr on total interest is unfair if you'd repay the 5-yr early anyway; compare at YOUR payoff date.
  4. Monthly-payment fit — debt payments ≤ 40% of take-home is the safety band.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Bank vs dealer finance. ¥200k car: bank 3.8% APR/3yr = ¥11,940 interest, no fees. Dealer "0 interest" + ¥8,000 fee + forced ¥3,000 in-store insurance premium = ¥11,000 and worse flexibility. Near tie — but the bank allows free early repayment.

Example 2 — Mortgage term choice. ¥1M at 3.3%: 20-yr payment ¥5,697, total interest ¥367k; 30-yr ¥4,380, interest ¥577k. Choosing 30-yr and investing the ¥1,317/mo difference at 4% beats the 20-yr option financially — but requires actual investing discipline; otherwise take 20 years.

Example 3 — Consumer loan trap. "月息0.5%" (0.5%/month flat) on ¥50k: sounds like 6%/year, actually flat-fee → real APR ≈ 11–13%. At ¥300k these products cost ¥20k+ more than a bank's 4% credit-line loan over 3 years.

Example 4 — Early repayment comparison. Loan A 3.6% with 1% early-repay penalty; Loan B 3.75% penalty-free. Planning to repay in 2 years: A's penalty (1% of ¥1M = ¥10k) exceeds the 0.15% rate difference saved (¥3k) — B wins for your horizon.

Common mistakes and myths

  1. 费率 vs 利率 — the oldest trick in lending; APR conversion is non-negotiable.
  2. Comparing monthly payments — longer terms always show smaller payments with larger totals; compare totals at equal horizons.
  3. Ignoring fees — a 0.3% rate advantage erased by ¥6,000 of fees on a ¥200k/2yr loan.
  4. Assuming early repayment is free — penalties of 1–5% exist in the fine print, especially year 1–2.
  5. Using the maximum approved amount — approval ≠ affordability; stress-test payments at +10% income shock.